In banded selection, which statement best describes the order of evaluating candidates?

In banded selection, which statement best describes the order of evaluating candidates?

• A. All higher-band candidates must be evaluated before considering anyone from a lower band.
• B. Lower band candidates are evaluated first.
• C. Banding is irrelevant to evaluation order.
• D. Only mid-band candidates are evaluated.

Answer: (A)

In banded selection, candidates are grouped into bands based on their scores, and the evaluation proceeds from the highest band to the lowest. This means you evaluate all applicants in the top band first, and only if there aren’t enough qualified candidates there do you move on to the next lower band. This ordering preserves the priority of higher-scoring candidates and ensures that the vacancy is filled from the strongest pool first, while still allowing lower bands to be considered if needed. The other statements misstate how banding works: evaluating lower bands first ignores the priority built into the bands, saying banding is irrelevant contradicts the purpose of organizing by bands, and evaluating only mid-band candidates omits consideration of higher or lower bands altogether.

In banded selection, candidates are grouped into bands based on their scores, and the evaluation proceeds from the highest band to the lowest. This means you evaluate all applicants in the top band first, and only if there aren’t enough qualified candidates there do you move on to the next lower band. This ordering preserves the priority of higher-scoring candidates and ensures that the vacancy is filled from the strongest pool first, while still allowing lower bands to be considered if needed. The other statements misstate how banding works: evaluating lower bands first ignores the priority built into the bands, saying banding is irrelevant contradicts the purpose of organizing by bands, and evaluating only mid-band candidates omits consideration of higher or lower bands altogether.