What is the rationale for merit selection according to Berman et al.?

What is the rationale for merit selection according to Berman et al.?

• A. Merit selection is justified for many public employees.
• B. Merit selection is never justified.
• C. Merit selection is required in all agencies.
• D. Merit selection is based on political connections.

Answer: (A)

The main idea is that hiring and promoting public employees based on their demonstrated ability, qualifications, and performance—rather than political ties—helps ensure capable and fair administration. Berman et al. argue that merit selection is justified for many public positions because it promotes competence, reduces favoritism, and increases public trust in government. It isn’t saying every single job must be filled this way or that political connections are used; rather, merit-based practices are appropriate for a large portion of public service where the goal is effective, professional administration. The other statements imply universal application, total exclusion of merit, or reliance on political influence, which don’t fit the rationale Berman et al. present.

The main idea is that hiring and promoting public employees based on their demonstrated ability, qualifications, and performance—rather than political ties—helps ensure capable and fair administration. Berman et al. argue that merit selection is justified for many public positions because it promotes competence, reduces favoritism, and increases public trust in government. It isn’t saying every single job must be filled this way or that political connections are used; rather, merit-based practices are appropriate for a large portion of public service where the goal is effective, professional administration. The other statements imply universal application, total exclusion of merit, or reliance on political influence, which don’t fit the rationale Berman et al. present.